{"id":7887,"date":"2025-02-14T20:10:15","date_gmt":"2025-02-14T12:10:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/?page_id=7887"},"modified":"2025-10-19T16:01:41","modified_gmt":"2025-10-19T08:01:41","slug":"4thlp","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/4thlp\/","title":{"rendered":"The Fourth International Workshop on Logic and Philosophy"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-page\" data-elementor-id=\"7887\" class=\"elementor elementor-7887\" data-elementor-settings=\"[]\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-section-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4a98206 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"4a98206\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-25 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-977d618\" data-id=\"977d618\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-56b1268 elementor-align-center elementor-widget__width-initial elementor-widget elementor-widget-button\" data-id=\"56b1268\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"button.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-button-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#inv\" class=\"elementor-button-link elementor-button elementor-size-sm elementor-animation-grow\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-content-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-text\">INVITED SPEAKERS<\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-25 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-a4f1afd\" data-id=\"a4f1afd\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-ab2e2a7 elementor-align-center elementor-widget__width-initial elementor-widget elementor-widget-button\" data-id=\"ab2e2a7\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"button.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-button-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#comm\" class=\"elementor-button-link elementor-button elementor-size-sm elementor-animation-grow\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-content-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-text\">COMMITTEES<\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-25 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-bfa31f6\" data-id=\"bfa31f6\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-1060370 elementor-align-center elementor-widget__width-initial elementor-widget elementor-widget-button\" data-id=\"1060370\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"button.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-button-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/registration-for-the-fourth-international-workshop-on-logic-and-philosophy-2025\/\" class=\"elementor-button-link elementor-button elementor-size-sm elementor-animation-grow\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-content-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-text\">REGISTRATION<\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-25 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-7e8fc7b\" data-id=\"7e8fc7b\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d842870 elementor-align-center elementor-widget__width-initial elementor-widget elementor-widget-button\" data-id=\"d842870\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"button.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-button-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t<a href=\"#prog\" class=\"elementor-button-link elementor-button elementor-size-sm elementor-animation-grow\" role=\"button\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-content-wrapper\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-button-text\">PROGRAM<\/span>\n\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-a9ab35d elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"a9ab35d\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-863da5d\" data-id=\"863da5d\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-a87bcc6 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"a87bcc6\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.5.6 - 28-02-2022 *\/\n.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-stacked .elementor-drop-cap{background-color:#818a91;color:#fff}.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-framed .elementor-drop-cap{color:#818a91;border:3px solid;background-color:transparent}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap{margin-top:8px}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap-letter{width:1em;height:1em}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap{float:left;text-align:center;line-height:1;font-size:50px}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap-letter{display:inline-block}<\/style>\t\t\t\t<h4 style=\"font-weight: 400; text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\">Social Norms: Logical Structures and Philosophical Foundations<\/span><\/h4><p style=\"font-weight: 400; text-align: center;\">November 1-2, 2025<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400; text-align: center;\">Tsinghua University, Beijing<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-0f404e8 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"0f404e8\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-background-overlay\"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-3369c19\" data-id=\"3369c19\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-cdb6c17 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"cdb6c17\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<header data-czr-model_id=\"regular_page_heading\" data-czr-template=\"templates\/parts\/content\/singular\/headings\/regular_page_heading\"><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><em style=\"font-size: 1.2em; text-align: inherit;\"><i>Theme of the workshop<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The nature and function of social norms have always been a key topic in various areas in philosophy, such as social philosophy, political philosophy, and ethics. Traditionally, logicians have been working on norms in the context of deontic logic, but they are now increasingly applying other perspectives, in particular various forms of game theory. \u00a0The landscape of approaches and analyses to social norms is further enriched by interactions with empirical sciences, such as economics, social psychology and anthropology.<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The workshop focuses on the connections and differences between philosophical and logical approaches. The connections are strong. Most philosophical analyses are carried out within the analytic tradition and share a lot of their conceptual sources with logical approaches. For example, Lewis\u2019s seminal work on convention, and the associated concept of social norms as a kind of convention, has inspired both philosophical analyses as well as logical approaches. \u00a0This makes philosophical and logical results mostly compatible and\/or complementary.<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But there are also differences. Philosophers and logicians do not always ask the same questions, and they do not employ the same methodologies in seeking to answer their questions. For example, logical frameworks, especially those employing the conceptual frameworks of game theory and decision theory, come with rationality assumptions that can be questioned from a philosophical perspective.<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Another set of issues revolves around the connections between individuals and groups. How are an individual\u2019s normative beliefs and attitudes related to the social norms that govern the communities to which that individual belongs? This hinges heavily on how one analyses the ontological and epistemological connections between social entities and the individuals that belong to them.<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The assumed conventionality of social norms raises another set of questions. Are social norms just conventional ways of regulating individual and group behavior? Or is there a natural dimension to them? And how does that affect questions of changeability of social norms and cross-community interpretability?<\/p><p style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In view of such questions, it is of central importance to explicitly chart and compare the variety of philosophical and logical approaches to social norms. And that is the central aim of the workshop.<\/p><\/header>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ee62d8f elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"ee62d8f\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-dc335ef\" data-id=\"dc335ef\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d600efa elementor-widget elementor-widget-menu-anchor\" data-id=\"d600efa\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"menu-anchor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.5.6 - 28-02-2022 *\/\nbody.elementor-page .elementor-widget-menu-anchor{margin-bottom:0}<\/style>\t\t<div id=\"inv\" class=\"elementor-menu-anchor\"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-e8f24d1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"e8f24d1\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<header class=\"entry-header \" data-czr-model_id=\"regular_page_heading\" data-czr-template=\"templates\/parts\/content\/singular\/headings\/regular_page_heading\">\n<div class=\"entry-header-inner\">\n<h2 class=\"entry-title\" style=\"text-align: center;\">Invited Speakers<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-523b749 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"523b749\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-a434b96\" data-id=\"a434b96\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-c63f773 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"c63f773\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<figure id=\"attachment_7898\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-7898\" style=\"width: 206px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7898 \" src=\"http:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Frank-Veltman.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"206\" height=\"210\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Frank-Veltman.jpg 2094w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Frank-Veltman-196x200.jpg 196w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Frank-Veltman-768x782.jpg 768w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Frank-Veltman-1508x1536.jpg 1508w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Frank-Veltman-2011x2048.jpg 2011w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 206px) 100vw, 206px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-7898\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/staff.science.uva.nl\/~veltman\/\">Frank Veltman<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><figure id=\"attachment_7966\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-7966\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7966\" src=\"http:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/liuxiaofei-200x200.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"210\" height=\"210\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/liuxiaofei-200x200.jpeg 200w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/liuxiaofei-80x80.jpeg 80w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/liuxiaofei.jpeg 400w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 210px) 100vw, 210px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-7966\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/philpeople.org\/profiles\/xiaofei-liu\">Xiaofei LIU<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-dd2902a elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"dd2902a\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-52ffbfe\" data-id=\"52ffbfe\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-47ce3f0 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"47ce3f0\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<figure id=\"attachment_7967\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-7967\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7967\" src=\"http:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Roy-200x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"210\" height=\"210\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Roy-200x200.jpg 200w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Roy-80x80.jpg 80w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Roy-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Roy-510x510.jpg 510w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/Roy.jpg 1000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 210px) 100vw, 210px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-7967\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.profilfelder.uni-bayreuth.de\/de\/emerging-fields\/governance-_-responsibility\/mitwirkende\/Roy\/index.php\">Olivier Roy<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><figure id=\"attachment_7968\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-7968\" style=\"width: 196px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-7968 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/2_0-e1743747753120-196x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"196\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/2_0-e1743747753120-196x200.jpg 196w, https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/2_0-e1743747753120.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 196px) 100vw, 196px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-7968\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><a href=\"https:\/\/philosophy.sysu.edu.cn\/teacher\/TangLiping\">Liping TANG<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-4ece719 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"4ece719\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-9800eaf\" data-id=\"9800eaf\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-761ceed elementor-widget elementor-widget-menu-anchor\" data-id=\"761ceed\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"menu-anchor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"comm\" class=\"elementor-menu-anchor\"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-ee3c74e elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"ee3c74e\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-9abf42e\" data-id=\"9abf42e\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-165ee86 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"165ee86\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<header class=\"entry-header \" data-czr-model_id=\"regular_page_heading\" data-czr-template=\"templates\/parts\/content\/singular\/headings\/regular_page_heading\"><div class=\"entry-header-inner\"><h2 class=\"entry-title\" style=\"text-align: center;\">Committees<\/h2><div>\u00a0<\/div><div><p class=\"17\">\u00a0<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/header><div class=\"post-entry tc-content-inner\"><section class=\"post-content entry-content \"><div class=\"czr-wp-the-content\"><div class=\"wp-block-columns\"><div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-top\"><ul><li class=\"wp-block-image\"><strong>Chair:<\/strong><\/li><\/ul><p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">&#8211; Martin Stokhof (University of Amsterdam, Tsinghua University)<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">&#8211; Chenwei SHI (Tsinghua University)<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">&#8211; Yiyan WANG (Shanxi University)<\/p><\/div><\/div><ul><li><strong>Program Committee: <\/strong><\/li><\/ul><p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">&#8211; Johan van Benthem (University of Amsterdam, Tsinghua University, Stanford University)<\/p><div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"20\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Ilaria Canovotto (University of Maryland)<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"p\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Bo <span class=\"16\">CHEN (Wuhan University)<\/span><\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"p\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Huimin DONG (Technische Universit\u00e4t Wien)<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"p\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span class=\"16\">&#8211; Jie<\/span><span class=\"17\">\u00a0<\/span><span class=\"16\">GAO (Zhejiang University)<\/span><\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"p\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span class=\"16\">&#8211; Asher JIANG (Tsinghua University<\/span><\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"20\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Fengkui JU (Beijing Normal University)<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">-Fenrong Liu (Tsinghua University)<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"20\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Frederik van de Putte (Erasmus University Rotterdam)<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"20\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Jeremy Seligman (University of Auckland)<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"20\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Sonja Smets (University of Amsterdam)<i><\/i><\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"20\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span class=\"16\">&#8211; Alessandro Sontuoso\u00a0(City University of London)<\/span><i><\/i><\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"p\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span class=\"16\">&#8211; Hao TANG (Tsinghua University)<\/span><\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"20\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span class=\"16\">&#8211; Yi WANG (Sun Yat-sen University)<\/span><\/p><p>\u00a0<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section><section class=\"post-content entry-content \"><div class=\"czr-wp-the-content\"><div><ul><li class=\"17\"><strong>Organising\u00a0Institutions<\/strong><\/li><\/ul><\/div><div><p class=\"17\" style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">&#8211; Department of Philosophy, Tsinghua University<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"17\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; School of Philosophy, Shanxi University<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"17\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Tsinghua University \u2013 University of Amsterdam Joint Research Center in Logic<\/p><p>\u00a0<\/p><\/div><\/div><ul><li style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><strong>Organising Committee<\/strong><\/li><\/ul><div><p class=\"17\" style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">&#8211; Chenwei SHI, Tsinghua University<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"17\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Yiyan WANG, Shanxi University<\/p><\/div><div style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><p class=\"17\" style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">&#8211; Martin Stokhof, University of Amsterdam &amp; Tsinghua University<\/p><\/div><\/section><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-d8fdf5b elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"d8fdf5b\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-ed7a9eb\" data-id=\"ed7a9eb\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-41801d1 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"41801d1\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"margin-top: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; font-family: 'Crimson Text', sans-serif; text-align: center;\">Registration<\/h2><p>\u00a0<\/p><p>Registration link:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/registration-for-the-fourth-international-workshop-on-logic-and-philosophy-2025\/\">https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/registration-for-the-fourth-international-workshop-on-logic-and-philosophy-2025\/<\/a><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-f8d9352 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"f8d9352\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-3f8e8c3\" data-id=\"3f8e8c3\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-06633c8 elementor-widget elementor-widget-menu-anchor\" data-id=\"06633c8\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"menu-anchor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div id=\"prog\" class=\"elementor-menu-anchor\"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-90df2da elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"90df2da\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-268e3f0\" data-id=\"268e3f0\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-2ea82a9 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"2ea82a9\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-35c695c\" data-id=\"35c695c\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-0632ef7 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"0632ef7\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"margin-top: 0px; overflow-wrap: break-word; font-family: 'Crimson Text', sans-serif; text-align: center;\">Program<\/h2><p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">The 4th International Workshop on Logic and Philosophy |\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Social Norms: Logical Structures and Philosophical Foundations<\/span><\/p><p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u7b2c\u56db\u5c4a\u903b\u8f91\u4e0e\u54f2\u5b66\u7814\u8ba8\u4f1a | \u793e\u4f1a\u89c4\u8303\u7684\u903b\u8f91\u7ed3\u6784\u4e0e\u54f2\u5b66\u57fa\u7840<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-42d85f3 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"42d85f3\" data-element_type=\"section\" data-settings=\"{&quot;background_background&quot;:&quot;classic&quot;}\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-background-overlay\"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-ee7db46\" data-id=\"ee7db46\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-3839407 elementor-drop-cap-yes elementor-drop-cap-view-default elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"3839407\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-settings=\"{&quot;drop_cap&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<table style=\"height: 395px;\" width=\"1647\"><tbody><tr><td width=\"150\"><p><strong>\u65f6\u95f4<\/strong><strong>Time<\/strong><strong>\uff1a<\/strong><strong>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p><\/td><td width=\"418\"><p>November 1-2, 2025<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\"><p><strong>\u5730\u70b9<\/strong><strong>Location<\/strong><strong>\uff1a<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td width=\"418\"><p>Meeting Room 440, Mengminwei Humanities Building<\/p><p>\u6e05\u534e\u5927\u5b66\u8499\u6c11\u4f1f\u4eba\u6587\u697c\uff0c440\u4f1a\u8bae\u5ba4<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"150\"><p><strong>\u4e3b\u529e\u65b9<\/strong><strong>Organizers<\/strong><strong>\uff1a<\/strong><\/p><\/td><td width=\"418\"><p>Tsinghua &#8211; UvA Joint Research Centre for Logic<\/p><p>\u6e05\u534e\u5927\u5b66-\u963f\u59c6\u65af\u7279\u4e39\u5927\u5b66\u903b\u8f91\u5b66\u8054\u5408\u7814\u7a76\u4e2d\u5fc3<\/p><p>Department of Philosophy, Tsinghua University<\/p><p>\u6e05\u534e\u5927\u5b66\u54f2\u5b66\u7cfb<\/p><p>School of Philosophy, Shanxi University<\/p><p>\u5c71\u897f\u5927\u5b66\u54f2\u5b66\u5b66\u9662<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><p><strong>\u8bae\u7a0b<\/strong><strong> Programme<\/strong><strong style=\"font-size: 1.2em; background-color: inherit; text-align: inherit;\">\u00a0<\/strong><\/p><ul><li><strong>2025-11-01<\/strong><strong style=\"font-size: 1.2em; background-color: inherit; text-align: inherit;\">\u00a0<\/strong><\/li><\/ul><table width=\"100%\"><tbody><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>8:00-9:00 \u00a0Registration<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"19%\"><p>Opening<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>9:00-9:20<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p>Welcome\uff1a<\/p><p>Martin Stokhof (Tsinghua &amp; UvA)<\/p><p><u>Tang<\/u> Wenming \u5510\u6587\u660e (Tsinghua University)<\/p><p><u>Wang<\/u> Yiyan \u738b\u5955\u5ca9 (Shanxi University)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>9:20-9:30 \u00a0Group photo<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"19%\"><p>Keynote<\/p><p>Presentation<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>9:30-10:45<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p><u>Tang<\/u> Liping \u5510\u4e3d\u840d (Sun Yat-Sen University)\uff1a<\/p><p>How social connections shape linguistic politeness: combining Games, ABMs, and LLMs<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>10:45-11:00\u00a0 Break<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td rowspan=\"2\" width=\"19%\"><p>Contributed<\/p><p>Presentations<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>11:00-11:30<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p>Zsolt Ziegler (Budapest University of Technology and Economics &amp; E\u00f6tv\u00f6s Lor\u00e1nd University)\uff1a<\/p><p>Universalizability as Strategy: Towards a Categorical Nash Equilibrium for Social Norms<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"16%\"><p>11:30-12:00<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p><u>Zhong<\/u> Jiani \u949f\u4f73\u59ae (Trinity College Dublin)\uff1a<\/p><p>Free Will as A Fundamentally Contested Concept<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>12:00-14:00\u00a0 Lunch<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td rowspan=\"2\" width=\"19%\"><p>Contributed<\/p><p>Presentations<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>14:00-14:30<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p><u>Liu<\/u> Yang \u5218\u6d0b (Unviersity of Cambridge)\uff1a<\/p><p>Transductive Decision Theory: Rethinking Intelligence from the Ground Up<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"16%\"><p>14:30-15:00<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p><u>Hu<\/u> Yetao \u80e1\u53f6\u6d9b (Shandong University)\uff1a<\/p><p>From Recombination Paradox to a Minimal Logic Core: A Paraconsistent, Non-Foundationalist Metaphysics of Modality<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>15:00-15:15\u00a0 Break<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td rowspan=\"2\" width=\"19%\"><p>Contributed<\/p><p>Presentations<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>15:15-15:45<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p><u>Liu<\/u> Xianrui \u5218\u663e\u777f (University of Bristol)\uff1a<\/p><p>Logic, Thought, and Normativity: A Critique of the Constitutive-Normative Account<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"16%\"><p>15:45-16:15<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p><u>Hu<\/u> Yang \u80e1\u626c (South China Normal University)\uff1a<\/p><p>The Norm for Logical Proof: Speech Act, Natural Deduction, and the Connecting Force<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 16:15-16:30\u00a0 Break<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"19%\"><p>Keynote<\/p><p>Presentation<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>16:30-17:45<\/p><\/td><td width=\"63%\"><p>Olivier Roy (Bayreuth University)\u00a0:<\/p><p>Perfect recall, knowledge memory, and action memory: individual and collective<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 18:00-19:30\u00a0 Banquet at Jiasuo \u7532\u6240\u5bbe\u9986<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><ul><li><strong>2025-11-02<\/strong><\/li><\/ul><table style=\"height: 880px;\" width=\"597\"><tbody><tr><td width=\"22%\"><p>Keynote<\/p><p>Presentation<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>9:00-10:15<\/p><\/td><td width=\"60%\"><p><u>Liu<\/u> Xiaofei \u5218\u6653\u98de (Wuhan University)\uff1a<\/p><p>Temporal Neutrality and Future Bias<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 10:15-10:30\u00a0 Break<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td rowspan=\"3\" width=\"22%\"><p>Contributed<\/p><p>Presentations<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>10:30-11:00<\/p><\/td><td width=\"60%\"><p><u>Li<\/u> Kai and <u>Wang<\/u> Yiyan \u674e\u6977\/\u738b\u5955\u5ca9 (Shanxi University)\uff1a<\/p><p>Implementing Social Norms to Enhance Agency<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"16%\"><p>11:00-11:30<\/p><\/td><td width=\"60%\"><p><u>Yu<\/u> Boning \u4e8e\u6cca\u5b81 (University of Maryland)\uff1a<\/p><p>Agents\u2019 Priors and Dynamic Networks: Two Novel Approaches to Enhancing Group Learning<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"16%\"><p>11:30-12:00<\/p><\/td><td width=\"60%\"><p><u>Chen<\/u> Jie \u9648\u6770 (University of Bologna)\uff1a<\/p><p>Regulatory Sandboxes as Epistemic Devices: A Logical Perspective on Institutional Experimentation<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\" width=\"100%\"><p>12:00-14:00\u00a0 Lunch<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"22%\"><p>Keynote<\/p><p>Presentation<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>14:00-15:15<\/p><\/td><td width=\"60%\"><p>Frank Veltman (University of Amsterdam)\uff1a<\/p><p>HOW \u2018NORMAL\u2019 BECOMES THE NORM<\/p><\/td><\/tr><tr><td width=\"22%\"><p>Closing<\/p><\/td><td width=\"16%\"><p>15:15-15:30<\/p><\/td><td width=\"60%\"><p>Martin Stokhof &amp; <u>Wang<\/u> Yiyan \u738b\u5955\u5ca9<\/p><p>(Tsinghua &amp; UvA \/ Shanxi University)<\/p><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-2e9dcb4 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"2e9dcb4\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-54e194f\" data-id=\"54e194f\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-4d52845 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"4d52845\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u6458\u8981<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Abstracts<\/span>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em>[Keynote speakers]<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><u>Tang<\/u>&nbsp;Liping&nbsp;\u5510\u4e3d\u840d&nbsp;(Sun Yat-Sen University)\uff1a<em><br><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:<\/span>&nbsp;How social connections shape linguistic politeness: combining Games, ABMs, and LLMs<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:<\/span>&nbsp;From the viewpoint of information transaction models in linguistic pragmatics, expressions of linguistic politeness (LP) impose costs upon speakers. That speakers regularly \u201cpay\u201d such a cost is what formal models of LP typically explain either by individual-level strategic considerations (e.g., the speaker&#8217;s aim of avoiding a face-threat to the hearer) or community-level conventional considerations (e.g., the use of LP as a relation-acknowledging device). Because these explanations are compatible, as each relates to the speaker and hearer&#8217;s social relations, we combine them into a single framework enriched by social network structures (star-shaped, ring-shaped, and fully connected networks).<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">We begin by constructing a basic game-theoretical model situated in social networks to capture request activities involving LP. In this model, a trade-off arises between the benefit of a successful request and the communicative cost of politeness, leading to the emergence of an optimal level of LP. To incorporate community-level effects, we define a weighted degree of LP that reflects the relative importance of strategic versus conventional considerations. Our analysis shows that the highest average optimal level of LP occurs in star-shaped networks\u2014an outcome that intuitively aligns with power-centered, hierarchical societies.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Building on this basic game, we develop agent-based models (ABMs) and conduct simulation studies to examine the dynamics of repeated request speech acts. In scenarios with randomly occurring requests and realizations of the probabilistic responses from hearers, we observe two distinct types of communication failures, each with measurable effects on the evolution of politeness across different network structures.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Finally, moving beyond rule-based ABMs, we explore the use of LP by data-driven large language model (LLM) agents. We conduct both single-instance and repeated interaction experiments, situating LLM agents within various networks to investigate their LP behavior in request scenarios.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><div><b><br><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Olivier Roy<\/span>&nbsp;(Bayreuth University) :<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:<\/span>&nbsp;Perfect recall, knowledge memory, and action memory: individual and collective<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract.<\/span>&nbsp;Perfect recall is arguably the most widely used model of individual memory in game theory and epistemic logic. This talk will begin with a historical overview to contextualise the various concepts of perfect recall that have been studied since the term was first introduced in game theory by Kuhn. Using modern tools, primarily from PDL, we will then revisit the classical decomposition of perfect recall into &#8216;knowledge memory&#8217; and &#8216;action memory&#8217; and provide a new characterisation of it. Next, we will transition from individual to collective memory, examining whether the components of perfect recall &#8216;lift&#8217; from individual to group knowledge. In other words, we will ask whether individual perfect recall imply perfect recall defined in terms of common and distributed knowledge. Finally, we will consider what happens to these notions of collective perfect recall when group membership can be variable or uncertain. (This is joint work with Zo\u00e9 Christoff (Groninen), Ondrej Majer (Prague), and Igor Sedlar (Prague).<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Liu<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Xiaofei&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u5218\u6653\u98de<\/span>&nbsp;(Wuhan University)\uff1a<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:<\/span>&nbsp;Temporal Neutrality and Future Bias<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:<\/span>&nbsp;Following Sidgwick and Rawls, many philosophers take temporal neutrality to be a basic principle of rationality. The standard conception of temporal neutrality, however, faces a well-known counterexample: future bias. Future bias is a type of bias which violates temporal neutrality yet does not appear to be irrational. Existing proposals arguing that future bias is irrational have nevertheless failed to show that the violation of temporal neutrality per se is irrational. I propose a new conception of temporal neutrality, one that explains the irrationality of future bias as a direct result of violating the principle of temporal neutrality.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><div><b><br><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Frank Veltman<\/span>&nbsp;(University of Amsterdam)\uff1a<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:<\/span>&nbsp;How `Normal\u2019 Becomes the Norm<br><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:<\/span>&nbsp;At first glance, the sentence &#8220;Bears hibernate&#8221; appears purely descriptive. However, in some contexts, it can take on a normative meaning&#8212; for example, when asserted in an angry tone by a mother bear. To her cubs, it may even sound like a command to stop playing and return to the den.<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Yet, not all generic sentences lend themselves to such a normative interpretation. In my talk, I will explore which ones do, which contexts enable this shift, and how this transformation occurs. The framework of update semantics, which defines meaning not in terms of truth conditions but by its potential impact on the addressee&#8217;s intentional state, offers a powerful basis for answering these questions.<br><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Keyword:<\/span>&nbsp;Expectations; Defaults; Functional normativity.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">\n<\/p><p><em>[Contributed speakers]<\/em><em style=\"font-size: 1.2em; background-color: inherit; text-align: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Zsolt Ziegler<\/span>&nbsp;(Budapest University of Technology and Economics)\uff1a<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>Universalizability as Strategy: Towards a Categorical Nash Equilibrium for Social Norms<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:&nbsp;<\/span>I define Constrained Nash Equilibrium (CNE): a pre-strategic universalization test is one that screens out principles whose universal adoption would lead to a violation of viability thresholds, and on the set of admissible, a Nash equilibrium is then calculated. As usual, conditions are met, and a CNE is present.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">I proved the local KKT equivalence to a prudential and price-based implementation (Self-restrained Nash, SNE) where Lagrange multipliers act as shadow costs. Thresholds (\u03b1,\u03b2) are not among the inputs of the contract but the least fixed point of a monotone operator that guarantees the best-reply stability with respect to a world model M that is common knowledge. The construction is simple and non-altruistic; it does not play a role in a one-time Prisoner&#8217;s Dilemma, however, it tightly rules the threshold settings, such as capacity, N\u22121 security, or carbon.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">The Domain-Boundary Theorem affirms that in smooth worlds, CNE is the same as NE, whereas in threshold worlds, CNE\/SNE correspond to the implementations of coherent self-restraint. Coherence comes before efficiency.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">The Domain-Boundary Theorem can be explained this way. Suppose M is common knowledge, and aggregate and individual viability functions set the viability set \u03a9(\u03b1,\u03b2). In this context, a constitutive threshold pair is (\u03b1*,\u03b2*) which indicates that the viability set defined by it is non-empty, closed under best replies (BR-closed), and at the minimal of the partial order. The first statement is relevant to the &#8220;Smooth-World&#8221; case. If the entire strategy space S is BR-closed, then the filter is empty, and the Constrained Nash Equilibrium (CNE) is identical to the Nash Equilibrium (NE). One of the equilibrium options, KE, may be helped by its equiproportional counterfactual way if the solution is chosen amongst multiple equilibria. Besides that, under particular convexity and aggregativity assumptions, it is also capable of choosing welfare-efficient outcomes from the Nash set. The second point relates to a &#8220;Threshold-World&#8221; case. Provided that the viability set \u03a9(\u03b1*,\u03b2*) is non-empty and BR-closed, with \u03b1* higher than zero and \u03b2* less than one, a principle is termed an inadmissible one whose universalization causes the outcome to be out of \u03a9. On the resulting set of the admissible, a CNE is found. A prudential cost with player Self-restrained Nash (SNE) locally performs the output of the same KKT first-order conditions through multipliers, which serve as a cap on the implementation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">To sum it up, the forum&#8217;s survival is at the heart of the issue, so coherence really comes before efficiency. CNE is the winner in threshold worlds.<\/p><div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul><li><strong><u>Zhong<\/u>&nbsp;Jiani<\/strong>&nbsp;\u949f\u4f73\u59ae&nbsp;(Trinity College Dublin)\uff1a<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:<\/span>&nbsp;Free Will as A Fundamentally Contested Concept<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:<\/span>&nbsp;Gregg Caruso has famously argued for a non-retributive criminal revolution. The philosophical image of free will forms the foundation of his argument, but the concept of free will is plural and contested. Here, I have two aims (1) I outline the philosophical, scientific, and folk conceptions of free will to express concern about free will sceptics who advocate a criminal justice revolution based solely on the philosophical conception. It is important to recognize that what underpins our everyday moral practices is the folk image of free will, and that the retributive punishment carried out by the state functions an outlet for the social emotions (e.g., resentment, revenge) associated with this conception. (2) Regardless of its justificatory role in retributive practices, belief in free will holds significant value in guiding human lives. I argue against the non-retributive proposal by employing a reductio argument.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Keywords:<\/span>&nbsp;Free Will; Moral Responsibility; Criminal Justice; Retributivism; The meaning of Life<\/p>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Liu<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Yang&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u5218\u6d0b<\/span>&nbsp;(Unviersity of Cambridge)\uff1a<span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.2em; background-color: inherit; text-align: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>Transductive Decision Theory: Rethinking Intelligence from the Ground Up<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:&nbsp;<\/span>Classical decision theory, in its subjectivist tradition from Ramsey to de Finetti to Savage, aims to reconstruct rationality from within &#8212; grounding belief and utility in the coherent preferences of a rational agent. While the framework successfully avoids appeals to objective chance or external standards, it preserves a more elusive metaphysical commitment: the primacy of the agent. The agent is taken as an unproblematic starting point &#8212; fully individuated, preference-maximising, and epistemically closed &#8212; whose internal coherence defines the domain of rational choice.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">This talk aims to encourage a conceptual reconstruction of the foundations of classical decision theory, showing that they rest not merely on structural assumptions, but on a particular image of agency. Our critique is not external or empirical, but internal and metaphysical: we examine what must be presupposed in order for the classical representation theorems to go through. In doing so, we clear the space for an alternative framework.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">We propose an idea of developing a, what we call, Transductive Decision Theory (TDT) &#8212; a model of decision-making that does not presuppose the agent, but treats both agents and choices as outcomes of a process of individuation. Drawing on the philosophy of Simondon, Deleuze, and Canguilhem, we propose a transductive logic in which decisions emerge as local stabilisations within an inferential field. TDT replaces utility maximisation with the dynamics of fixpoints, and offers a new foundation for thinking about rationality, inference, and choice &#8212; one that may be better suited to emergent systems, from AI architectures to biological organisms.<\/p>\n<div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Hu<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Yetao&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u80e1\u53f6\u6d9b<\/span>&nbsp;(Shandong University)\uff1a<span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.2em; background-color: inherit; text-align: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>From Recombination Paradox to a Minimal Logic Core: A Paraconsistent, Non-Foundationalist Metaphysics of Modality<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:<\/span>&nbsp;This paper argues that the Recombination Paradox is an instance of Graham Priest&#8217;s Inclosure Schema. This re-diagnosis provides a powerful critical lens: conventional solutions, such as David Lewis&#8217;s ad hoc restrictions or Nolan&#8217;s appeal to proper classes, are revealed as &#8220;consistency restoration&#8221; strategies that fail to engage the paradox&#8217;s underlying structure. The paper then evaluates the dialetheic solution naturally suggested by the inclosure diagnosis. It contends that this solution is metaphysically fatal to modal realism, as by positing a possible-yet-impossible limit object, it subverts the framework\u2019s core function of analyzing modality. The final and crucial step of the argument exposes a hidden flaw in the dialetheist\u2019s defense: Priest&#8217;s attempt to offer a logical and metaphysical neutral account of possibility is argued to rest covertly on Logical Humean Supervenience (LHS) \u2014a substantial, non-neutral metaphysical thesis with radical consequences of its own. Thus, the dialetheic resolution faces a profound challenge, potentially rendering it untenable for those unwilling to accept its deep metaphysical costs.<\/p>\n<div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Liu<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Xianrui&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u5218\u663e\u777f<\/span>&nbsp;(University of Bristol)\uff1a<span style=\"font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.2em; background-color: inherit; text-align: inherit;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>Logic, Thought, and Normativity: A Critique of the Constitutive-Normative Account<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:<\/span>&nbsp;In this talk I examine the contested relationship between logic and thought, with particular focus on the constitutive, normative, and constitutive-normative accounts. While the constitutive account collapses in the face of logical error and the purely normative view struggles to explain why logic holds normative authority over thought, the hybrid constitutive-normative account fails to deliver on its promise to resolve these issues, thus it remains internally inconsistent and unable to justify logic&#8217;s normative jurisdiction. Instead, I defend a version of the more traditional view: logic is constitutive of truth, while truth itself is normative for thought. Logic thus obtains normative force not directly, but via its constitutive connection to truth and the principle that thought ought to aim at truth. This layered account preserves logic\u2019s descriptive nature while coherently grounding its normative role in human reasoning.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Hu<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Yang&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u80e1\u626c<\/span>&nbsp;(South China Normal University)\uff1a<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>The Norm for Logical Proof: Speech Act, Natural Deduction, and the Connecting Force<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:&nbsp;<\/span>\u00ab&nbsp;Proof norm&nbsp;\u00bb indicates the compelling character of a given proof: the premises are forced to be stepwise connected and to go forward its conclusion. We address the question how such norm arises. Both Reseal (2024) and Pagin (2024) presuppose force conventionalism for answering the question, which fails to account for the natural deduction proof practice involving the inferential rules with eigenvariable conditions. I shall argue for a notion of \u00ab&nbsp;prover\u2019s meaning&nbsp;\u00bb, derived from Gricean \u00ab&nbsp;speaker\u2019s meaning&nbsp;\u00bb. It can help us to identify what we call \u00ab&nbsp;conversationally illocational force&nbsp;\u00bb ascribed to the speech acts performed in the natural deduction proof, and it is the force commonly presumed between the prover and proofreaders. Further, such \u00ab&nbsp;conversationally illocational force&nbsp;\u00bb can further be explained as \u00ab&nbsp;connecting force&nbsp;\u00bb which gives rise to the proof norm. Last, we attempt to point out possible ways to give a formal characterization of the connecting force.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Li<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Kai and&nbsp;<u>Wang<\/u>&nbsp;Yiyan&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u674e\u6977<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\/<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u738b\u5955\u5ca9<\/span>&nbsp;(Shanxi University)\uff1a<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>Implementing Social Norms to Enhance Agency<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:&nbsp;<\/span>In this paper, we present a formal framework for norm design and evaluate proposed norms from the perspective of rule-makers. The framework assesses norms based on two criteria: implementation cost and the fairness of the resulting payoffs. Using default logic to formalize norms, along with the delta parameters proposed by Crawford and Ostrom to model payoff changes, we analyze the trade-offs between these criteria. We also examine how players&#8217; responses to norms, as well as their expectations of others&#8217; responses, can influence the result equilibria. Several examples illustrate how such reactions prevent a norm from achieving its intended effects.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Beyond its technical apparatus, the framework sheds light on the philosophical nature of collective agency. It shows that social groups can act as unified agents through the iterative adjustment and enforcement of norms. The formal analysis identifies the conditions under which collective intentions arise from individual compromises, and explains how normative structures both reflect and constitute shared agency. Our framework further explores the examples and consequences of norms affecting multiple strategic games, and characterizes how new norms can be introduced to correct unintended effects, if such remedification is possible.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Yu<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Boning&nbsp;<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">\u4e8e\u6cca\u5b81<\/span>&nbsp;(University of Maryland)\uff1a<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>Agents\u2019 Priors and Dynamic Networks: Two Novel Approaches to Enhancing Group Learning<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:&nbsp;<\/span>This paper investigates how two novel network arrangement strategies influence group learning within Zollman\u2019s epistemic models. Specifically, I explore how arranging networks based on agents\u2019 prior beliefs and implementing dynamic network structures affect a group\u2019s accuracy and speed in reaching consensus. The explanatory framework centers on transient diversity. Results show that arrangements which initially restrict communication and then permit more information exchange significantly improve group learning effectiveness. The underlying mechanism is that such controlled communication allows agents sufficient time to independently gather evidence and develop a more cautious attitude toward belief revision, thereby reducing collective susceptibility to misleading information.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<div><b><u><br><\/u><\/b><\/div><ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><u>Chen<\/u><\/span><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;Jie&nbsp;<\/span>\u9648\u6770 (University of Bologna)\uff1a<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Title:&nbsp;<\/span>Regulatory Sandboxes as Epistemic Devices: A Logical Perspective on Institutional Experimentation<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">Abstract:&nbsp;<\/span>Regulatory sandboxes are increasingly used by legal institutions to manage normative and technical uncertainty in fast-evolving fields like AI and fintech. While often viewed as innovation-friendly regulatory tools, this presentation reframes them as structured&nbsp;epistemic devices&nbsp;that embody non-classical forms of reasoning under uncertainty and value conflict. Sandboxes function as meta-regulatory responses to epistemic opacity and value pluralism. They create environments where regulators, firms, and other stakeholders collaboratively explore contested concepts such as fairness, risk, and compliance. This process generates not only empirical data but also defeasible justifications for future norms, aligning with non-monotonic and argumentation-based logics. Three epistemological foundations underpin sandboxes:&nbsp;Experimentalism;&nbsp;Constructivism&nbsp;and&nbsp;Pragmatic justificationism. Formally, sandboxes can be modeled using non-monotonic logic, structured argumentation frameworks, and goal-based reasoning. These tools capture how norms and claims evolve through dynamic, multi-agent deliberation. A case study of the EU AI Act illustrates how sandboxes facilitate dialectical reasoning, where stakeholder positions are contested and refined through justification rather than rule application. This reflects a broader shift in legal governance toward defeasible, context-sensitive rationality. In conclusion, regulatory sandboxes serve not only as institutional innovations but also as real-world instantiations of logical reasoning under uncertainty, offering a fertile ground for philosophical and formal investigation.<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-8e4804b elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"8e4804b\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-79d2764\" data-id=\"79d2764\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-49acaa3 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"49acaa3\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div><p class=\"20\"><strong><i>Further information &amp; questions:<\/i><\/strong><\/p><\/div><div><p class=\"19\">Contact: <a href=\"mailto:yiyanthu@gmail.com\"><u><span class=\"17\">yiyanthu@gmail.com<\/span><\/u><\/a><\/p><\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>INVITED SPEAKERS COMMITTEES REGISTRATION PROGRAM Social [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7887"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7887"}],"version-history":[{"count":60,"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7887\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8531,"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/7887\/revisions\/8531"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tsinghualogic.net\/JRC\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7887"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}